
Movement Vocabulary
Tempo and Rhythm
Levels
Pathways
Shape
Dynamics
Relationships
Travel
Stillness
Variations on a theme
Classroom ideas
Dance styles
General
Resources
The School Show Page is created and maintained by
Peter Lathan.
All contents are copyright and may not be
reproduced in any form without the permission of the copyright holder.
Email |
Dance -
Vocabulary
This is an area where Dance and Drama intersect. Movement is a
vital ingredient in both (unless you're doing Becket's Endgame!)
and the Dance idea of the movement vocabulary can be of great use to the
director of a show. It's a very simple concept: the movement vocabulary of a
piece is simply a list of those movements which are appropriate to the piece.
The Choreographer of Cats, for instance, describes in her
programme note how she spent a great deal of time devising a movement
vocabulary (or movement language, as, I recall, she expresses it) which would
suggest the idea of felinity (my awful word, not hers!), without simply being
an attempt by a human being to mimic a cat.
In discussing (in a TV interview) his approach to creating a
piece based on numerous versions of the song Stardust,
choreographer Richard Alston used the phrase when talking about how he tried to
create movement which would reflect each different version.
If, in the classroom situation, you were devising a dance piece
on, say, the theme of fireworks, you would list those movement words which
reflect what fireworks do. With kids you would talk about, for example,
Catherine Wheels, and ask them to create a movement which expressed the idea of
a Catherine Wheel. Words like spinning, spiral, circular, round and so on all
spring to mind, and a Catherine Wheel section of the dance would be based upon
the movements suggested by these words.
This is a very basic dance idea, but a very important one. It
is also one which can be adapted to drama work with profit. In preparing for
Toad of Toad Hall I spent a lot of time devising, with the kids, a
movement vocabulary for the chorus of Weasels, Ferrets and Stoats, which would
suggest that they were animals (in particular, wild wooders), give an
indication of their character, and contribute to the visual picture I was
trying to create.
Please note that I was not trying to imitate animals,
but using animal movements as the basis for human movements.
Both of these words relate to time: the tempo of a piece is the
number of movements completed within a specific time (either a part or the
whole of a dance), whilst the dance's rhythm relates to the patterning of
movements. One of the most difficult things to do when working with kids in
dance is to get them away from the idea that dance is a pattern of
movements reflecting the beat of the music. It is inevitable that this will be
so, as, for the majority of kids, dance means disco. But in fact there is no
reason why a dance should not work in opposition to the tempo or rhythm of the
music, any more than there is no reason for the rhythm of a dance to be
regular.
Generally, the more movements performed within a particular
period of time, the faster the tempo. This is obvious, so it should be equally
obvious that, if the tempo of the music is fast (i.e. there are a lot of notes
in a particular time-period) and the tempo of the dance is slow, then a real
tension is created which can have a great effect upon the audience.
One of the first things that a would-be dancer has to learn is
how to count! By counting the rhythm of the music, (s)he can relate movements
to the beat. Dancing to the beat normally means one movement (or pause) per
beat (which is the easy and, for most people, natural way to move to music),
whereas if a movement is carried across a number of beats, then the dancer is
working in opposition to the tempo of the music. Clapping and counting
exercises are an essential start to learning to dance!
Dance exists within space as well as time and the choreographer
must consider the spatial variations available and make proper use of them. The
variation which is often forgotten about by beginners or those whose background
is in disco dancing is variation in level. Movement can be high (reaching
upwards or leaping or jumping), low (crouched, sitting or lying) or in the
middle, which is where most movement takes place. Movement on each level has
its own effect and a variation in level always provides more interest.
Another spatial variant which forms part of the choreographer's
armoury is the pathway: the direction of movement through the dance space.
Those whose ideas of dance derive from disco tend to think mainly in terms of
forward and back (down- and upstage), but there are numerous movement pathways
(sideways, diagonal, circular, semi-circular, figure of eight, and so on) and
as many combinations as you can think of. Each pathway has its own effect on
the audience.
The shape the body takes in the course of the dance is
obviously important, for each shape says something to the audience. When I
first introduce a class to dance, I tell them there are four basic body shapes:
- The Pin: a long, thin shape, made by stretching the body as high as
it will go, reaching up with the hands and balancing on the tips of the toes
- The Wall: a wide shape, made by stretching the arms and legs as wide
as possible
- The Ball: made by wrapping yourself up into as small a space as
possible
- The Screw:a twisted shape - standing upright with the body twisted
from the waist so that the head is looking backwards and the arms are wrapped
round as far as they will go.
Although this is very basic indeed, it is also true that all
other body shapes derive from these.
The Dynamics of a dance are what gives it its emotional impact.
Basically Dynamics refer to how a movement is done. Movements can be
percussive, flowing, angular, smooth, jagged, hesitant, confident - the list is
endless. Dynamics - the quality of movement - is central to all dance
creation and performance.
Relationships are all about the way dancers interact with each
other in the course of the dance piece. There are many forms of interaction:
- Solo:Here the dancers work independently of each other. What they do
relates in some way, even if only because of the fact that they are on-stage at
the same time
- Unison: This is when all the dancers work together, all doing the same
thing at the same time.This is the sort of realtionship which most kids will
naturallly fall into, even though it is not always appropriate.
- Canon: Here one dancer sets off the movement of another by coming into
contact, or adopting the same pose, or by some other signal.
There are two kinds of movement: movement of the body in a particular space
and movement of the body through space. You might call the first static
movement - the body is moving (or, at least, parts of it are) but it remains in
one place - and in dance we call the second (movement from one place to
another) travel. The reason we give it this name is that it is important to
distinguish between these two types of movement.
Just as in Drama a pause can be extremely significant, so in Dance stillness
can make a great impact on the audience. Young actors (and the not so young!)
often find it very difficult to hold a pause for any length of time - for
pauses require a great deal of confidence and discipline - and young dancers
and choreographers often have the same problem. Stillness is an important dance
technique.
Just a couple of days ago I was discussing, with one of my GCSE Expressive
Arts students, a dance piece she was making. "I'm a bit worried about
it," she said. "It's only a couple of minutes long and I've used up
all the moves I can think of that suit it." It came as quite a surprise to
her when I said that it isn't necessary for every move to be different, that
there is nothing wrong with repetition and variation.
"What," I asked her, "is wrong with variations on the
movements you've already used?" Suppose you're making a dance which
contrasts freedom and being hemmed in, why not use precisely the same moves,
but with a different dynamic? Take the simple idea of making a wide sweeping
movement of the arms. To express the idea of freedom and, perhaps, its
associated joy, you bring the hands up to the chest and then curve the arms out
smoothly, reaching wide as if embracing the world. Now, when the tone changes,
when the dancer is expressing the idea of being hemmed in, what is wrong with
using the same gesture but, instead of the arms going out to their full width,
they are stopped halfway?
You can, I suggested, go beyond that (for it's sounding a bit like the
walled-up-in-a-glass-case mime exercise!) and, instead of the gesture being
stopped in its tracks, as it were, you allow the elbows to go slack and and the
arms to droop. This might suggest defeat. Or you could change the sweeping
nature of the gesture to one of fighting against the constraint, and you have a
totally different mood established. You're using the same gesture but
introducing a variation.
We sat down and watched a video of Christopher Bruce's Ghost Dances (a
brilliant dance piece - if you get the chance to see it, grab it with both
hands) and watched how Bruce keeps re-using the same movements and gestures
(much as a composer will re-use the same tune but in a different key, or
inverted, or with a change of tempo).
She went back to work happy, and the finished piece was beautiful.
(It turned out in the end that she got an 'A' Grade for the piece!)
|
|